Lots of grumpiness in the Telegraph today (HT Christophe) about the lack of talent in the latest Simon C primetime vehicle, the appropriately (as it turns out) misnamed, Britain's Got Talent.
Just because I've mentioned it before, doesn't make it less right: with popular entertainment (like pop music), the qualities of the thing have only a marginal effect on popularity. These kind of tv shows are unlikely to be about the quality of the participants and their acts (we wouldn't be that engaged tbh).
The really big thing shaping the outcome is what other folks are getting excited about - what those around you are doing and talking about...
Thinking this kind of thing is in anyway about 'talent' however you choose to define that is a category 1. error!
As Cory D might say, the quality of content is only important insofaras it prompts the conversation...