...was the print edition title of this piece in the Christmas special edition of New Scientist
How we get to choose what others do? Chris "long tail" Anderson pitted against Duncan Watts (again)
Nice quote from DW for you to cut out and put on your cube wall:
""There is a naive assumption that people are making decisions independently, scouring all possible choices and then optimising...But people aren't rational in that weird economists' sense."
Quite apart from the cognitive overload aspect, Watts thinks that the films we watch or the music we listen to is not entirely, or even mostly, about the thing being consumed. It is about the social context in which we consume it. "If you're dating a girl who likes AC/DC, you might start listening to AC/DC. With another girlfriend, you might be listening to Aerosmith," he says.
Ultimately, he thinks, our love of the blockbuster might just reflect that we humans are constantly looking out for a place to go - one where others are too. "A culture is a set of people who share beliefs, ideas and artefacts," says Watts. "Blockbusters are part of that - they make us feel we belong to something."
Great stuff.
[2 questions to the author, Richard Webb:
1. Not sure what the point of the distinction is between "Organic" vs. Artificial blockbusters?
2. Why wait a year after the fuss about Duncan's download study?]
Free gift: that scene starring the late, great Estelle Reiner